Sunday, November 24, 2019

Ethical Issues in Counseling Essay Example

Ethical Issues in Counseling Essay Example Ethical Issues in Counseling Essay Ethical Issues in Counseling Essay Ethical motiveWhen I sit and think about what the construct of moralss agencies to me. it seems as if there are many thoughts that come to mind. Although they all revert back to one simple significance and that is to believe in what you say and say what you believe. Treat everyone every bit. make non judge one individual from the following and make your occupation as you have been taught. I think that we should utilize moralss in our mundane lives non merely in the work force country. As per our literature the term moralss means. cosmopolitan rules that societies have determined to be right. merely and just and are by and large regarded as the criterions that govern the behavior of a individual. ( Unit 02: Ethical Issues in Counseling ) 1. Following. discourse the National Association of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Counselors ( NAADAC’s ) Code of Ethics. Smith and Hodges define moralss as a human reflecting self-consciously on the act of being a moral being. This implies a procedure of self-reflection and consciousness of how to act as a moral being. Some definitions are dictated by jurisprudence. single belief systems. faith or a mixture of all three.NAADAC recognizes that its members and certified counsellors live and work in many diverse communities. NAADAC has established a set of ethical best-practices that apply to universal ethical deliberation. Further. NAADAC recognizes and encourages the impression that personal and professional moralss can non be deal t with as separate spheres. NAADAC members. dependence professionals and/or licensed/certified intervention suppliers ( later referred to as dependence professionals ) recognize that the ability to make good is based on an implicit in concern for the wellbeing of others. This concern emerges from acknowledgment that we are all stakeholders in each other’s lives – the wellbeing of each is closely bound to the wellbeing of all ; that when the felicity of some is purchased by the sadness of others. the phase is set for the wretchedness of all. Addiction professionals must move in such a manner that they would hold no embarrassment if their behaviour became a affair of public cognition and would hold no trouble supporting their actions before any competent authorization.The NAADAC Code of Ethics was written to regulate the behavior of its members and it is the recognized criterion of behavior for dependence professionals certified by the National Certification Commission. The codification of moralss reflects ideals of NAADAC and its members. When an moralss ailment is filed with NAADAC. it is evaluated by confer withing the NAADAC Code of Ethics. The NAADAC Code of Ethics is designed as a statement of the values of the profession and as a usher for doing clinical determinations. This codification is besides utilized by province enfranchisement boards and educational establishments to measure the behaviour of dependence professionals and to steer the enfranchisement procedure. What sort of issues does NAADAC’s Code of Ethics reference?2. Last. choose one constituent of NAADAC’s Code of Ethics. Briefly summarize the constituent and discourse how it will impact your interaction with clients. For illustration. you may take the constituent of the Counseling Relationship or Professional Responsibility within NAADAC’s Code of Ethics. All documents should be written utilizing 12 point Times New Roman font with one inch borders. Be certai n to properly mention all beginnings used within your composing assignment utilizing APA format. For a reappraisal of APA manner and how to mention beginnings. delight see Proper APA Format Citation in the Study Skills schoolroom or see the Research Guides page on the Online Library Resources site.

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Drug Courts Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Drug Courts - Research Paper Example Conversely, when those forces are unequal, some economics focus on the 'supply side' of the equation, while others view the 'demand' side as that which needs to be focused on. The history of economics is one that shifts in emphasis from supply to demand and back again. It will be argued in the following that the use of 'diversion' in the courts represents a good step toward tackling the 'demand' side of the drug equation. And, what is important beyond the success or failure, is that it is an attempt to deal with demand rather than continuing the war on drugs that aims mostly at supply. This said, while it is a step in the right direction, there are some important limitations. Community based drug rehabs have had a largely positive outcome. One of the tertiary side effects of wide scale drug use, is the increase in crime as a consequence. While it is the case that drug use itself is largely illegal, that is not the sole crime committed by drug users. There is a large incarceration rat e of individuals who did crimes to support their drug habits [Stone and Stone 95]. This can mean something as simple as a house-robbery, to the large scale distribution of narcotics, to neglecting the welfare of one's children because of the time constraints and debilitating effects of addiction. These three examples stand to show how diverse the consequences of drug addiction is. Policing and thus, the criminal justice system are pretty burdened by drug abuse both in its primary sense, but also in the secondary or tertiary consequences of addicted behaviors. The cost of this involvement is formidable. For instance, where a community based drug rehab was in place in Washington State, the cost to the community for every dollar spent varied from over $ 18 benefit from investing in a community program, just over $ 5. dollars for investing in criminal prosecution and just $ 2.08 for diversion courts [Velazquez 14]. The dollar investment in community based programs is economically much m ore successful than other approaches, and yet, it is estimated that among the population in the US, nine percent of Americans are addicted to some type of narcotic on the one hand, and on the other hand, less than a quarter of those receive substance abuse treatment, and finally, among that quarter, about 37 % of those treated were mandated to do so [Velasquez 14]. Before looking at how and where the drug court system presents itself as limited, as compared, for example, with the optimal course of treatment which is community based, some remarks on the success of drug courts will be presented. Likewise, the rationale behind the very practice will get outlined. The very purpose of drug courts, is to avoid the costly endeavor of criminal incarceration. There is a cost built into housing an individual in jail, but also a larger cost than that when one considers what a criminal record is going to cost that individual [Nolan 129]. For instance, one could describe a 'vicious circle' of cr iminality associated with drug behavior. When a convicted individual returns to the regular world, so to speak, they will find themselves with a very diminished capacity as far as basic opportunities go. A criminal record means that many opportunities that might have once been open to them, are no longer available because of the conviction and incarceration. For instance, when we look at the recidivism rate among individuals who have been convicted, the rate is much higher for people who have a prior criminal conviction [Wolfe,